No credit card required.
On November 24,the Registrar transmitted by to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the Domain Name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Respondent has no bona fide offering of goods or services, as the Domain Name is not operational and is listed for sale.
The Complainant offers adult entertainment in the form of downloadable video recordings, motion pictures, film clips, and images. Visit Us .
Have you seen our latest promotions? enter now.
Moreover, according to the Complainant, the Respondent has not provided contact details because the Respondent understands it lacks legitimate interests in the Domain Name. The Respondent is Jurgen Neeme, Estonia. The Respondent cannot establish rights in the Domain Name, as it has not made use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering.
The Center appointed Mathias Lilleengen as the sole panelist in this matter on January 4, The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. IP and Business Universities Judiciaries. The Domain Name was registered on April 15, At the time of drafting the Decision, the Domain Name redirected to a pay-per-click web featuring links to adult entertainment webs.
The Panel finds that the Complainant has made out an unrebutted case. For the reasons set out above, the Panel concludes that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith, within the meaning of paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy. The Respondent has made no bona fide use of the Domain Name. Factual Background The Complainant offers adult entertainment in the form of downloadable video recordings, motion pictures, film clips, and images.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name in accordance with paragraph 4 a ii of the Policy.
The Center sent an communication to the Complainant on November 25,providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. There is no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired unregistered trademark rights. On November 24,the Center transmitted by to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Domain Name.
The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
Xhamster ip holdings ltd v. jurgen neeme
See section 2. Discussion and Findings A. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant has made unrebutted assertions that it has not granted any authorization to the Respondent to register the Domain Name or otherwise make use of its mark.
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is identical to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4 a i of the Policy. Jurgen Neeme Case No. D 1.
Administrative panel decision
Complainant The Complainant provides evidence of trademark registrations and goodwill in its trademarks. The pay-per-click web listed the Domain Name for sale.
The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on November 27, In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on November 30, In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was December 20, The Respondent did not submit any response.
The Complainant has made unrebutted assertions that it has not granted any authorization to the Respondent to register the Domain Name or otherwise make use of its mark. The Complainant provides evidence of trademark registrations and goodwill in its trademarks.